Skip to content
Katherine C. Pearson, Editor, and a Member of the Law Professor Blogs Network on LexBlog.com

UNSHARED SACRIFICE–the GOP Budget Proposal

From the Center for Budget and Policy Priorities:

By the end of this week, eight House Committees will have adopted proposals that would reducespending in a wide range of mandatory (or “entitlement”) programs. These proposals, which nextweek will be combined into a single reconciliation bill by the House Budget Committee, have beendefended as necessary to reduce the deficit and offset hurricane-related costs (though as explainedbelow, neither claim is accurate). Yet the proposals passed out of House committees do not reflectan approach of shared sacrifice, particularly when viewed as part of a budget reconciliation processthat also facilitates the adoption of more tax cuts.

Even though poverty, food insecurity, and the number of people lacking health insurance have allbeen rising, the House bills would ask low-income families to shoulder a large share of the budgetcuttingburden, leaving them with less access to needed health care and basic food aid. Childrenwould receive less of the child support they are owed, and many poor individuals with disabilitieswould have to wait longer to receive the back payments to which they are entitled.

While cutting programs that benefit low-income families and individuals, the House reconciliationproposals shy away from some sensible program cuts that are opposed by powerful lobbyinginterests, such as Medicare managed care companies. In addition, the House reconciliationproposals would not call for any sacrifice in the form of scaling back the benefits of tax cuts enactedin the last four years, whose benefits overwhelmingly have gone to higher-income taxpayers.In fact, rather than asking those high-income households to share in the sacrifice, the House isplanning to pass a new round of tax cuts under the same fast-track reconciliation process being usedto push through the program cuts.

These tax cuts, a substantial portion of which are expected to goto high-income households, would further exacerbate income inequality, which is alreadyexceptionally large and growing. And because the new tax cuts would cost more money than thebudget cuts would save, the budget cuts would in effect be used not to reduce the deficit or payhurricane-related costs, but rather to help pay for the new tax cuts.

Read the full report, entitled, “UNSHARED SACRIFICE: Who’s Hurt, Who’s Helped, and What’s Spared Under the Emerging House Budget Reconciliation Plan”

Posted in: